LIFEHUBBER
Choose theme

AI Resources

Social Media Skills

GitHub stars: 3.8K GitHub forks: 876 Declared license: MIT: MIT Last pushed September 15, 2026: Pushed 22d ago
Stats from GitHub

Social Media Skills is a public collection of 17 reusable instruction packs for social-media work with AI assistants.

The collection starts with files that describe who you are and how you write, then carries that context into LinkedIn posts, newsletters, short-video scripts, content planning, visual prompts, and performance review. Use this as a first read, not a recommendation. Open the original project before trusting details like terms, limits, privacy, cost, setup, or safety.

What it is

A connected set of social-media skills

These are readable SKILL.md instruction folders, not a social network, model, autonomous agent, or posting service. They tell a compatible AI assistant how to handle specific jobs and how to reuse the same creator context across them.

Why it stands out

Voice files come first

The voice-builder creates about-me.md and voice.md from an interview and writing samples. Other skills read those files before drafting, so the workflow is built around a reusable voice profile instead of a fresh style prompt for every post.

Availability

Public repository with several install paths

The public toolkit supports Codex and Claude. Its installation guide covers selected Codex skill folders, a Claude Code plugin, and individual Claude Desktop uploads. The repository declares an MIT license.

Why it matters

What makes it useful

Social content often becomes inconsistent when every draft starts from a blank chat. This collection gives creators a way to keep their audience, topic pillars, voice patterns, and off-limits choices in plain files that later skills can read and creators can edit.

Notable points

What stands out

The post-scorer separates two kinds of feedback. With verified author post history, it compares a draft with patterns in that history. Without it, the skill gives editorial feedback and leaves historical comparison unavailable. Its engagement weighting is an editorial choice, and a high score is not a prediction of reach.

Before using

What to review

Read each skill before installing it. Some instructions are closely shaped around the publisher's own voice, content system, preferred language, and examples.

Start with your own writing samples and review the generated voice files before letting later skills reuse them.

The scorer can use a supplied export or a separately authorised Apify fetch. Its instructions limit collection to post bodies and aggregate counts, excluding comments and replies; check the account, scope, and cost before a paid fetch.

Visual skills can stop at a Gemini prompt. Image generation and inspection still require the corresponding tools; a prompt is not an inspected image export.

Keep the final editorial and publishing decision with a person, especially when a draft uses performance data or a strong hook formula.

Check the files, browser tools, external services, accounts, and paid actions expected by each selected skill; the scorer-specific collection limits do not describe every skill.

Reader fit

Who may find it relevant

Creators who want reusable voice and social-content workflows inside an AI assistant.

Teams that prefer editable instruction files over a fixed social-media automation service.

Less relevant if you want automatic multi-network publishing or a finished analytics service without supplying data and tools.

Editorial note

Why LifeHubber lists it

For a creator planning several posts on one topic, the content matrix supplies separately named angles across eight formats, helping them choose variety before writing the full drafts. For post planning, read one topic row across the content-matrix skill’s eight formats. Each cell is meant to contain a specific headline, so a how-to, an explanation, and a comparison should offer different angles on that topic. Choose a cell by its topic and format to expand into a full post. This gives you a way to spot a grid that merely repeats the same idea before drafting from it.

Source links

Source materials

Reader note

Before relying on this entry

LifeHubber lists entries to help readers inspect AI projects, not to endorse them or prove they are safe, suitable, accurate, maintained, or right for a specific use. We do not verify every entry in depth. Before relying on anything listed, review the original materials, terms, privacy practices, limits, and risks that matter for your situation.

Advertisements

Advertisements

For project maintainers

Listed here? You can use the badge.

If you maintain a project with a current LifeHubber listing, you may add the optional “Listed on LifeHubber AI Resources” badge to its README, docs, or website. No introduction or permission request is needed.

See what’s moving